Article info
PDFResponse
Risk-relativity is still a nonsense
- Correspondence to Dr Neil John Pickering, Bioethics Centre, University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; neil.pickering{at}otago.ac.nz
Citation
Risk-relativity is still a nonsense
Publication history
- Received May 3, 2022
- Accepted May 10, 2022
- First published May 20, 2022.
Online issue publication
May 19, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (19 May 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Risk-related standards of competence are a nonsense
- Competence for physician-assisted death of patients with mental disorders: theoretical and practical considerations
- Authenticity and autonomy in deep-brain stimulation
- A case study from the perspective of medical ethics: refusal of treatment in an ambulance
- Adolescent autonomy revisited: clinicians need clearer guidance
- Overriding competent medical treatment refusal by adolescents: when “no” means “no”
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- A test for mental capacity to request assisted suicide
- Rationality, religion and refusal of treatment in an ambulance revisited
- Cake or death? Ending confusions about asymmetries between consent and refusal