Article info
PDFResponse
Non-accommodationism and conscientious objection in healthcare: a response to Robinson
- Correspondence to Dr Steve Clarke, Institute for Science and Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK; stephen.clarke{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Non-accommodationism and conscientious objection in healthcare: a response to Robinson
Publication history
- Received March 28, 2022
- Accepted April 21, 2022
- First published April 29, 2022.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Voluntarily chosen roles and conscientious objection in health care
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: new directions
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- When should conscientious objection be accepted?
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer
- Public reason and the limited right to conscientious objection: a response to Magelssen