Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Surrogacy: beyond the commercial/altruistic distinction
  1. J Y Lee
  1. Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Dr J Y Lee, University of Copenhagen, 1017 København, Denmark; ji.young.lee{at}sund.ku.dk

Abstract

In this article, I critique the commonly accepted distinction between commercial and altruistic surrogacy arrangements. The moral legitimacy of surrogacy, I claim, does not hinge on whether it is paid (‘commercial’) or unpaid (‘altruistic’); rather, it is best determined by appraisal of virtue-abiding conditions constitutive of the surrogacy arrangement. I begin my article by problematising the prevailing commercial/altruistic distinction; next, I demonstrate that an assessment of the virtue-abiding or non-virtue-abiding features of a surrogacy is crucial to navigating questions about the moral legitimacy of surrogacy; in the final part, I reject other moral heuristics that might be proposed as alternatives to the commercial/altruistic dichotomy, and reiterate that a virtue-ethical framework is the most suitable way forward.

  • Surrogate Mothers
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Ethics

Data availability statement

No data are available. Not applicable.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Data availability statement

No data are available. Not applicable.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors JYL is the sole author of this article and guarantor.

  • Funding This study was funded by Velux Fonden (00026589).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Other content recommended for you