Article info
PDFFeature article
Assisted gestative technologies
- Correspondence to Dr Elizabeth Chloe Romanis, Gender and Law at Durham, Durham Law School, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK; elizabeth.c.romanis{at}durham.ac.uk
Citation
Assisted gestative technologies
Publication history
- Received July 28, 2021
- Accepted February 17, 2022
- First published March 11, 2022.
Online issue publication
May 18, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (18 May 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Assisted gestative technologies, or on treating unlike cases alike
- Commercial surrogacy: how provisions of monetary remuneration and powers of international law can prevent exploitation of gestational surrogates
- Surrogacy and the law in the UK
- Iran’s experience with surrogate motherhood: an Islamic view and ethical concerns
- A surrogate’s secrets are(n’t) safe with me: patient confidentiality in the care of a gestational surrogate
- ‘These were made-to-order babies’: Reterritorialised Kinship, Neoliberal Eugenics and Artificial Reproductive Technology in Kishwar Desai’s Origins of Love
- Willing mothers: ectogenesis and the role of gestational motherhood
- Having a child together in lesbian families: combining gestation and genetics
- Should HIV discordant couples have access to assisted reproductive technologies?
- Uterus transplantation: ethical and regulatory challenges