Article Text
Commentary
Genetic exceptionalism, revisionism, pluralism and convergence in the ethics of insurance: response to commentators
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors JP is the sole author.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Genetic information, insurance and a pluralistic approach to justice
- A step forward, but still inadequate: Australian health professionals’ views on the genetics and life insurance moratorium
- Genetic information, discrimination, philosophical pluralism and politics
- Genetic discrimination in life insurance: a human rights issue
- Social insurance, mutualistic insurance and genetic information
- Genetic information, social justice, and risk-sharing institutions
- Ethical issues in predictive genetic testing: a public health perspective
- 53 GENETIC DISCRIMINATION BY INSURERS AS A RESULT OF GENETIC RESEARCH AND TESTING: A COMPARISON OF NATIONAL POLICIES
- The routinisation of genomics and genetics: implications for ethical practices
- Genomic privacy, identity and dignity