Article info
PDFOriginal research
Differences between sperm sharing and egg sharing are morally relevant
- Correspondence to Dr Nathan Hodson, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; Nathan.hodson{at}warwick.ac.uk
Citation
Differences between sperm sharing and egg sharing are morally relevant
Publication history
- Received September 18, 2021
- Accepted December 23, 2021
- First published January 6, 2022.
Online issue publication
December 19, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (19 December 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Observational retrospective study of UK national success, risks and costs for 319,105 IVF/ICSI and 30,669 IUI treatment cycles
- Intrauterine insemination: a UK survey on the adherence to NICE clinical guidelines by fertility clinics
- The stem cell debate continues: the buying and selling of eggs for research
- Correlation of IVF outcomes and number of oocytes retrieved: a UK retrospective longitudinal observational study of 172 341 non-donor cycles
- A brief and personal history of ‘what’s in a name’ in reproductive genetics
- Predicting the chances of a live birth after one or more complete cycles of in vitro fertilisation: population based study of linked cycle data from 113 873 women
- VALUE study: a protocol for a qualitative semi-structured interview study of IVF add-ons use by patients, clinicians and embryologists in the UK and Australia
- Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence
- The ethical case for non-directed postmortem sperm donation
- Claims for fertility interventions: a systematic assessment of statements on UK fertility centre websites