Citation Tools
PDFFeature article
Responsibility, second opinions and peer-disagreement: ethical and epistemological challenges of using AI in clinical diagnostic contexts
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Responsibility, second opinions and peer-disagreement: ethical and epistemological challenges of using AI in clinical diagnostic contexts
Other content recommended for you
- Agree to disagree: the symmetry of burden of proof in human–AI collaboration
- Are physicians requesting a second opinion really engaging in a reason-giving dialectic? Normative questions on the standards for second opinions and AI
- Second opinion programmes in Germany: a mixed-methods study protocol
- Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study
- Characteristics associated with requests by pathologists for second opinions on breast biopsies
- Second opinion in breast pathology: policy, practice and perception
- Second opinion utilization by healthcare insurance type in a mixed private-public healthcare system: a population-based study
- Patient-initiated second medical consultations—patient characteristics and motivating factors, impact on care and satisfaction: a systematic review
- AI decision-support: a dystopian future of machine paternalism?
- Responsibility and decision-making authority in using clinical decision support systems: an empirical-ethical exploration of German prospective professionals’ preferences and concerns