Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 7 November 2021
- Published on: 7 November 2021The response to COVID-19 of many countries has been dictated so far by the media, or better by those who control the media, rather than the scientists. To find a solution, scientists should be free of this conditioning
Dahlquist and Kugelberg (2021) correctly notice as the many non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) which have been introduced to stop or slow down the COVID-19 pandemic through coercion are not publicly justified through a scientific consensus on the factual propositions that are used to support the policies, and as such, they would be illegitimate. It has been an unfortunate circumstance of this pandemic, that not only the NPIs but also the therapeutic approaches have been the subject of media misinterpretation, at the expense of a correct debate in between the scientific community, with scientists expressing opinions not welcomed by the media routinely abused for doing their work. Examples of policies lacking every scientific support, but still approved by the media, are everywhere. To find a working solution to the pandemic, definitively we do need free science “on the top”, rather than “on the tap” or even “on a leash”, limiting the interference by governments and corporations directly and through the media serving their interests. Misinformation by media is what has made the response to COVID-19 less effective than what could have been listening to the majority of the scientists. The response to COVID-19 of many countries has been dictated so far by the media, or better by those who control the media, rather than the scientists. To find a solution, scientists should be free of this conditioning.
REFERENCES
Show More
1. Dahlquist M, Kugelberg HD. (2021). Public j...Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- National and subnational governance and decision-making processes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria: an empirical analysis
- A partisan pandemic: state government public health policies to combat COVID-19 in Brazil
- Challenges to evidence-informed decision-making in the context of pandemics: qualitative study of COVID-19 policy advisor perspectives
- Income inequality and pandemics: insights from HIV/AIDS and COVID-19—a multicountry observational study
- How health systems approached respiratory viral pandemics over time: a systematic review
- Cross-sectional survey of changes in knowledge, attitudes and practice of mask use in Sydney and Melbourne during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic
- How much does government’s short-term response matter for explaining cross-country variation in COVID-19 infection outcomes? A regression-based relative importance analysis of 84 countries
- Ethical issues in Nipah virus control and research: addressing a neglected disease
- Public health measures to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Canada during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review
- Implementing an emergency risk communication campaign in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria: lessons learned