Article info
PDFResponse
Defending two dilemmas
- Correspondence to Dr Teresa Baron, Institute of Philosophy, Czech Academy of Sciences, Praha 110 00, Czech Republic; baron{at}flu.cas.cz
Citation
Defending two dilemmas
Publication history
- Received September 1, 2021
- Accepted September 9, 2021
- First published October 5, 2021.
Online issue publication
November 16, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (16 November 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Two dilemmas for medical ethics in the treatment of gender dysphoria in youth
- Flawed reasoning on two dilemmas: a commentary on Baron and Dierckxsens (2021)
- High court should not restrict access to puberty blockers for minors
- Gender dysphoria in adolescents: can adolescents or parents give valid consent to puberty blockers?
- Forever young? The ethics of ongoing puberty suppression for non-binary adults
- Assessment and support of children and adolescents with gender dysphoria
- Current management of male-to-female gender identity disorder in the UK
- Exploring gender dysphoria and related outcomes in a prospective cohort study: protocol for the Swedish Gender Dysphoria Study (SKDS)
- Clinical guidelines for children and adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria or incongruence: a systematic review of recommendations (part 2)
- Supporting autonomy in young people with gender dysphoria: psychotherapy is not conversion therapy