Article info
PDFOriginal research
Watson, autonomy and value flexibility: revisiting the debate
- Correspondence to Jasper Debrabander, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; jasper.debrabander{at}ugent.be
Citation
Watson, autonomy and value flexibility: revisiting the debate
Publication history
- Received April 16, 2021
- Accepted September 4, 2021
- First published September 15, 2021.
Online issue publication
May 19, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (28 November 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Computer knows best? The need for value-flexibility in medical AI
- Formal and effective autonomy in healthcare
- Fostering relational autonomy in end-of-life care: a procedural approach and three-dimensional decision-making model
- Recent insights into decision-making and their implications for informed consent
- Patient preferences for autonomy in decision making in asthma management
- Decision-making autonomy in maternal health service use and associated factors among women in Mettu District, Southwest Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study
- Advance decisions in dementia: when the past conflicts with the present
- First among equals? Adaptive preferences and the limits of autonomy in medical ethics
- Development and pilot-testing of patient decision aid for use among Chinese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma
- Availability and usage of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) in office-based primary care settings in the USA