Article info
Original research
Ethics of genomic passports: should the genetically resistant be exempted from lockdowns and quarantines?
- Correspondence to Dr Christopher Gyngell, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; christopher.gyngell{at}mcri.edu.au
Citation
Ethics of genomic passports: should the genetically resistant be exempted from lockdowns and quarantines?
Publication history
- Received February 4, 2021
- Accepted May 23, 2021
- First published June 25, 2021.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- Passport to freedom? Immunity passports for COVID-19
- A pragmatic approach to COVID-19 vaccine passport
- Immunity passports, fundamental rights and public health hazards: a reply to Brown et al
- Vaccine passports and health disparities: a perilous journey
- Why ‘one size fits all’ is not enough when designing COVID-19 immunity certificates for domestic use: a UK-wide cross-sectional online survey
- Covid-19 vaccine passports: access, equity, and ethics
- Flashing red lights: the global implications of COVID-19 vaccination passports
- The unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccine policy: why mandates, passports and restrictions may cause more harm than good
- Compulsory medical intervention versus external constraint in pandemic control
- The unnaturalistic fallacy: COVID-19 vaccine mandates should not discriminate against natural immunity