Article Text
Abstract
Fraud in medical publications is an increasing concern. In particular, disciplines related to perioperative medicine—including anaesthesia and critical care—currently hold the highest rankings in terms of retracted papers for research misconduct. The dominance of this dubious achievement is attributable to a limited number of researchers who have repeatedly committed scientific fraud. In the last three decades, six researchers have authored 421 of the 475 papers retracted in perioperative medicine. This narrative review reports on six cases of fabricated publication in perioperative medicine that resulted in the paper’s retraction. The process that led to the unveiling of the fraud, the impact on clinical practice, and changes in regulatory mechanisms of scientific companies and governmental agencies’ policies are also presented. Fraud in medical publications is a growing concern that affects perioperative medicine requiring a substantial number of papers to be retracted. The continuous control elicited by readers, by local institutional review boards, scientific journal reviewers, scientific societies and government agencies can play an important role in preserving the ‘pact of trust’ between authors, professionals and ultimately the relationship between doctors and patients.
- applied and professional ethics
- anaesthetics / anesthesiology
- clinical ethics
- education
- ethics
Data availability statement
There are no data in this work.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Boldt: the great pretender
- Should research fraud be a crime?
- Use of perioperative hydroxyethyl starch 6% and albumin 5% in elective joint arthroplasty and association with adverse outcomes: a retrospective population based analysis
- Retractions in the medical literature: how can patients be protected from risk?
- Exclusion of suspect data raises question mark over safety of common plasma substitute
- An investigation into the impact and implications of published papers from retracted research: systematic search of affected literature
- Using ‘nudge’ principles for order set design: a before and after evaluation of an electronic prescribing template in critical care
- Does retraction after misconduct have an impact on citations? A pre–post study
- Concerns over use of hydroxyethyl starch solutions
- Role of regional anesthesia and analgesia in enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials