Article info
Current controversy
Future of global regulation of human genome editing: a South African perspective on the WHO Draft Governance Framework on Human Genome Editing
- Correspondence to Bonginkosi Shozi, School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; 214511633{at}stu.ukzn.ac.za
Citation
Future of global regulation of human genome editing: a South African perspective on the WHO Draft Governance Framework on Human Genome Editing
Publication history
- Received September 2, 2020
- Revised January 28, 2021
- Accepted February 5, 2021
- First published March 24, 2021.
Online issue publication
March 01, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (24 March 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report
- Heritable human genome editing is ‘currently not permitted’, but it is no longer ‘prohibited’: so says the ISSCR
- The moral argument for heritable genome editing requires an inappropriately deterministic view of genetics
- Guerrilla eugenics: gene drives in heritable human genome editing
- Too early to allow pregnancies with genome edited embryos, says commission
- Genome editing, Goldilocks and polygenic risk scores
- Goldilocks and the two principles. A response to Gyngell et al
- The ethics, equity, and governance of human genome editing need greater consideration
- Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of “human dignity” in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- We need to talk about imperatives