Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Surrogate decision making in crisis
- Correspondence to Professor Dominic Wilkinson, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; dominic.wilkinson{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Surrogate decision making in crisis
Publication history
- Received December 29, 2020
- Accepted February 14, 2021
- First published March 11, 2021.
Online issue publication
April 25, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (25 April 2022).
- Previous version (25 April 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Consent for babies born following surrogate pregnancies
- Commentary to ‘surrogate decision making in crisis’
- Interpretations, perspectives and intentions in surrogate motherhood
- Ethics briefings
- A surrogate’s secrets are(n’t) safe with me: patient confidentiality in the care of a gestational surrogate
- One mum too few: maternal status in host surrogate motherhood arrangements
- Narratives of neoliberalism: ‘clinical labour’ in context
- Altruistic surrogacy: the necessary objectification of surrogate mothers
- Having children outside a heterosexual relationship: options for persons living with HIV
- The misplaced embryo: legal parenthood in ‘embryo mix-up’ cases