Article Text
Abstract
Guidelines recommend a ‘do-not-resuscitate’ (DNR) code status for inpatients in which cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) attempts are considered futile because of low probability of survival with good neurological outcome. We retrospectively assessed the prevalence of DNR code status and its association with presumed CPR futility defined by the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation score and the Clinical Frailty Scale in patients hospitalised in the Divisions of Internal Medicine and Traumatology/Orthopedics at the University Hospital of Basel between September 2018 and June 2019. The definition of presumed CPR futility was met in 467 (16.2%) of 2889 patients. 866 (30.0%) patients had a DNR code status. In a regression model adjusted for age, gender, main diagnosis, nationality, language and religion, presumed CPR futility was associated with a higher likelihood of a DNR code status (37.3% vs 7.1%, adjusted OR 2.99, 95% CI 2.31 to 3.88, p<0.001). In the subgroup of patients with presumed futile CPR, 144 of 467 (30.8%) had a full code status, which was independently associated with younger age, male gender, non-Christian religion and non-Swiss citizenship. We found a significant proportion of hospitalised patients to have a full code status despite the fact that CPR had to be considered futile according to an established definition. Whether these decisions were based on patient preferences or whether there was a lack of patient involvement in decision-making needs further investigation.
- decision-making
- end-of-life
Data availability statement
Data are available upon request.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- How long is long enough, and have we done everything we should?—Ethics of calling codes
- CODE: a practical framework for advancing patient-centred code status discussions
- Ethical issues surrounding do not attempt resuscitation orders: decisions, discussions and deleterious effects
- Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: a joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing
- Quality of life after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients over the age of 80 years
- Factors that influence decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the views of doctors and medical students
- ‘Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation’ discussions at the point of discharge: a case note review of hospice practice following local integrated policy implementation
- Variation in the design of Do Not Resuscitate orders and other code status options: a multi-institutional qualitative study
- Emergency care staff experiences of lay presence during adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a phenomenological study
- Duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and outcomes for adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: retrospective cohort study