Article Text
Abstract
Patient autonomy is one of the four pillars of modern medical ethics. In some cases, however, its value is not absolute and autonomy may be overridden by sufficiently important matters of public interest. Coroner’s autopsies represent an example of when the wishes of the deceased and their family may come in conflict with the benefits of knowledge gained from understanding the cause of death. Current legislation governing coroner’s autopsies relies on the assumption of their obvious public benefit, hence consent for them need not be sought. This interpretation has attracted controversy, as exemplified by the case of Rotsztein vs HM Senior Coroner and a recent study questioning the prevalent use of invasive autopsy. However, this issue has received little recent attention in ethical literature. In this essay, the ethical nature of coroner’s autopsies in cases of natural deaths with unexplained causes is examined as a balance between patient autonomy and the value of knowledge gained from them. This is done by analysing a case which under current legislation warrants coroner’s autopsy, however, its ethical justification remains contentious. This discussion is expanded by discussion of non-invasive alternatives and comparison to another situation which balances individual autonomy with public benefits—organ donation. The conclusion of this analysis is a moral middle ground in which objection to invasive autopsy could be respected once issues of overriding public interest are excluded, or at least non-invasive alternatives should be considered, with coroners left responsible for demonstrating specific public needs that could override objection.
- attitudes toward death
- autonomy
- death
Data availability statement
Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Introduction of postmortem CT increases the postmortem examination rate without negatively impacting the rate of traditional autopsy in daily practice: an implementation study
- How can we ensure that the coroner’s autopsy is not an invasion of human rights?
- Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study
- High risk medicolegal autopsies: is a full postmortem examination necessary?
- Less invasive autopsy: an evidenced based approach
- The effects of postmortem CT scanning all cases entering a UK public mortuary: a 3-month pilot
- Are coroners' necropsies necessary? A prospective study examining whether a “view and grant” system of death certification could be introduced into England and Wales
- Post mortem scientific sampling and the search for causes of death in intensive care: what information should be given and what consent should be obtained?
- Assessing the use of magnetic resonance imaging virtopsy as an alternative to autopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Imaging the dead