For the past 40 years, the 14-day rule has governed and, by defining a clear boundary, enabled embryo research and the clinical benefits derived from this. It has been both a piece of legislation and a rule of good practice globally. However, methods now allow embryos to be cultured for more than 14 days, something difficult to imagine when the rule was established, and knowledge gained in the intervening years provides robust scientific rationale for why it is now essential to conduct research on later stage human embryos. In this paper, I argue that the current limit for embryo research in vitro should be extended to 28 days to permit research that will illuminate our beginnings as well as provide new therapeutic possibilities to reduce miscarriage and developmental abnormalities. It will also permit validation of potentially useful alternatives. Through consideration of current ethical arguments, I also conclude that there are no coherent or persuasive reasons to deny researchers, and through them humanity, the knowledge and the innovation that this will generate.
- embryos and fetuses
- in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer
- reproductive medicine
- policy guidelines/inst. review boards/review cttes
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors SM is the sole author of this article.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement There are no data in this work.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson’s analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations
- Why we should not extend the 14-day rule
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- A brief and personal history of ‘what’s in a name’ in reproductive genetics
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Potentiality of embryonic stem cells: an ethical problem even with alternative stem cell sources
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- Going high and low: on pluralism and neutrality in human embryology policy-making
- The moral value of induced pluripotent stem cells: a Japanese bioethics perspective on human embryo research