Article Text
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) interventions are novel devices being investigated for the management of severe treatment-resistant psychiatric illnesses. These interventions require the invasive implantation of high-frequency neurostimulatory probes intracranially aiming to provide symptom relief in treatment-resistant disorders including obsessive-compulsive disorder and anorexia nervosa. In the scientific literature, these neurostimulatory interventions are commonly described as reversible and to be used as a last resort option for psychiatric patients. However, the ‘last resort’ status of these interventions is rarely expanded upon. Contrastingly, usages of DBS devices for neurological symptoms (eg, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy or dystonia) have paved the way for established safety and efficacy standards when used earlier in a disease’s timeline. As DBS treatments for these neurological diseases progress to have earlier indications, there is a parallel ethical concern that early implementation may one day become prescribed for psychiatric illnesses. The purpose of this article is to build off contemporary understandings of reversible neurostimulatory interventions to examine and provide clarifications on the ‘last resort’ status of DBS to better address its ethically charged use in psychiatric neurosurgery. To do this, evaluative differences between DBS treatments will be discussed to demonstrate how patient autonomy would be a paramount guiding principle when one day implementing these devices at various points along a psychiatric disease’s timeline. In presenting the clarification of ‘last resort’ status, the ethical tensions of early DBS interventions will be better understood to assist in providing psychiatric patients with more quality of life years in line with their values.
- deep brain stimulation
- autonomy
- psychiatry
- neuroethics
- psychosurgery
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors Initial literature review and original manuscript fabrication completed by IS. Subsequent manuscript revisions, both before and after initial submission, performed by IS and FG.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Deep brain stimulation: a return journey from psychiatry to neurology
- Informed consent for clinical trials of deep brain stimulation in psychiatric disease: challenges and implications for trial design
- Outcomes from stereotactic surgery for essential tremor
- Charting the road forward in psychiatric neurosurgery: proceedings of the 2016 American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery workshop on neuromodulation for psychiatric disorders
- No going back? Reversibility and why it matters for deep brain stimulation
- Deep brain stimulation: practical insights and common queries
- Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens for comorbid obsessive compulsive disorder and Tourette 's syndrome
- Deep brain stimulation for obsessive – compulsive disorders: long - term analysis of quality of life
- Comparative effectiveness of neuroablation and deep brain stimulation for treatment - resistant obsessive - compulsive disorder: a meta-analytic study
- Approaches to neuromodulation for schizophrenia