Article Text
Abstract
Ethical climate (EC) has been broadly described as how well institutions respond to ethical issues. Developing a tool to study and evaluate EC that aims to achieve sustained improvements requires a contemporary framework with identified relevant drivers. An extensive literature review was performed, reviewing existing EC definitions, tools and areas where EC has been studied; ethical challenges and relevance of EC in contemporary paediatric intensive care (PIC); and relevant ethical theories. We surmised that existing EC definitions and tools designed to measure it fail to capture nuances of the PIC environment, and sought to address existing gaps by developing an EC framework for PIC founded on ethical theory. In this article, we propose a Paediatric Intensive Care Ethical Climate (PICEC) conceptual framework and four measurable domains to be captured by an assessment tool. We define PICEC as the collective felt experience of interdisciplinary team members arising from those factors that enable or constrain their ability to navigate ethical aspects of their work. PICEC both results from and is influenced by how well ethical issues are understood, identified, explored, reflected on, responded to and addressed in the workplace. PICEC encompasses four, core inter-related domains representing drivers of EC including: (1) organisational culture and leadership; (2) interdisciplinary team relationships and dynamics; (3) integrated child and family-centred care; and (4) ethics literacy. Future directions involve developing a PICEC measurement tool, with implications for benchmarking as well as guidance for, and evaluation of, targeted interventions to foster a healthy EC.
- children
- ethics committees/consultation
- health care for specific diseases/groups
- health personnel
- interests of health personnel/institutions
Data availability statement
There are no data in this work
Statistics from Altmetric.com
- children
- ethics committees/consultation
- health care for specific diseases/groups
- health personnel
- interests of health personnel/institutions
Data availability statement
There are no data in this work
Footnotes
Twitter @drkatiemoynihan, @drmjansen
Collaborators Roxanne Kirsch, Lucia Wocial, Brian Leland, Gillian Colville and Rouven Porz for the Ethical Climate Collaborative (ECC).
Contributors KMM and LT conceptualised and designed the proposed conceptual framework, drafted the initial manuscript and reviewed and revised the manuscript. LC and M-CB, and HI and RT revised and modified the conceptual framework and edited the manuscript for important intellectual content. AO created the survey tool for external expert feedback and edited the manuscript for important intellectual content. MJ conceptualised and designed the proposed conceptual framework and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Understanding ethical climate, moral distress, and burnout: a novel tool and a conceptual framework
- Moral distress within neonatal and paediatric intensive care units: a systematic review
- Ethics consultation in paediatric and adult emergency departments: an assessment of clinical, ethical, learning and resource needs
- Ethical decision-making climate in the ICU: theoretical framework and validation of a self-assessment tool
- Can we accredit hospital ethics? A tentative proposal
- Factors of hospital ethical climate among hospital nurses in Korea: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
- Towards collective moral resilience: the potential of communities of practice during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond
- Differences in access to Emergency Paediatric Intensive Care and care during Transport (DEPICT): study protocol for a mixed methods study
- Understanding what wellbeing means to medical and nursing staff working in paediatric intensive care: an exploratory qualitative study using appreciative inquiry
- Conscientious objection and moral distress: a relational ethics case study of MAiD in Canada