Responses
Extended essay
‘The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back’: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
No responses have been published for this article.
Other content recommended for you
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions
- Health policy and systems research: towards a better understanding and review of ethical issues
- Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries
- Lay REC members: patient or public?
- The experiences of ethics committee members: contradictions between individuals and committees
- Does setting good practice standards for research ethics committees increase their legal liability?
- Determining the need for ethical review: a three-stage Delphi study
- Navigating the maze: ethics approval pathways for intellectual disability research
- Ethics review of research: in pursuit of proportionality