Article Text
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic will likely recede only through development and distribution of an effective vaccine. Although there are many unknowns surrounding COVID-19 vaccine development, vaccine demand will likely outstrip early supply, making prospective planning for vaccine allocation critical for ensuring the ethical distribution of COVID-19 vaccines. Here, we propose three central goals for COVID-19 vaccination campaigns: to reduce morbidity and mortality, to minimise additional economic and societal burdens related to the pandemic and to narrow unjust health inequalities. We evaluate five prioritisation approaches, assess their likely impact on advancing the three goals of vaccine allocation and identify open scientific questions that may alter their outcomes. We argue that no single prioritisation approach will advance all three goals. Instead, we propose a multipronged approach that considers the risk of serious COVID-19 illness, instrumental value and the risk of transmission, and is guided by future research on COVID-19-specific clinical and vaccine characteristics. While we focus this assessment on the USA, our analysis can inform allocation in other contexts.
- allocation of health care resources
- clinical ethics
- health care for specific diseases/groups
- public health ethics
This article is made freely available for use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.
https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usageStatistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @smorain
Contributors RG developed the idea for the manuscript. RG and SRM contributed to the literature review, analysis, drafting, editing and proofreading of the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement There are no data in this work.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Other content recommended for you
- Will vaccination refusal prolong the war on SARS - CoV-2
- Two centuries of immunisation in the UK (part II)
- Postmarketing studies: can they provide a safety net for COVID-19 vaccines in the UK
- Multivalue ethical framework for fair global allocation of a COVID-19 vaccine
- Incentivising wealthy nations to participate in the COVID-19 Vaccine Global Access Facility (COVAX): a game theory perspective
- Rethinking global access to vaccines
- Covax must go beyond proportional allocation of covid vaccines to ensure fair and equitable access
- Science, medicine, and the future: Vaccines and vaccination
- Scarce vaccine supplies in an influenza pandemic should not be distributed randomly: reply to McLachlan
- Fairer financing of vaccines in a world living with COVID-19