Article Text
Current controversy
Good Reasons to Vaccinate: Mandatory or Payment for Risk?
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Julian Savulescu, Good Reasons to Vaccinate: Mandatory or Payment for Risk?. J Med Ethics 2020
This is the author’s accepted manuscript of the article. The typeset PDF will appear online as soon as it is ready and it will replace this version.
Supplementary materials
Linked Articles
Other content recommended for you
- Spoonful of honey or a gallon of vinegar? A conditional COVID-19 vaccination policy for front-line healthcare workers
- The unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccine policy: why mandates, passports and restrictions may cause more harm than good
- Exploring vaccine hesitancy in care home employees in North West England: a qualitative study
- Persuasion, not coercion or incentivisation, is the best means of promoting COVID-19 vaccination
- COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities
- Vaccine mandates for healthcare workers beyond COVID-19
- No Jab, No Job? Ethical Issues in Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination of Healthcare Personnel
- Evaluating potential unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccine mandates and passports
- Healthcare workers’ (HCWs) attitudes and related factors towards COVID-19 vaccination: a rapid systematic review
- Covid-19: Is the UK heading towards mandatory vaccination of healthcare workers?