Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Physician unionisation in the USA: ethical and empirical considerations and the free-rider problem
  1. Arjun S Byju1,
  2. Kajsa Mayo2
  1. 1Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Health System, Bronx, New York, USA
  2. 2University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to Arjun S Byju, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA; arjun.byju{at}einsteinmed.org

Abstract

While American physicians have traditionally practised as non-unionised professionals, there has been increasing debate in recent years over whether physicians in training (known also as interns, residents or house staff) are justified in unionising and using collective action. This paper examines specific ethical criteria that would permit union action, including a desire to ameliorate patient care as well as the goal of improving the conditions of working physicians. We posit that traditional rebuttals to physician unionisation often lean on an infinite conception of a doctor’s energies and obligations, one that promotes burnout and serves to advance the financial motives of hospital management and administration. Furthermore, this paper explores the empirical justifications for collective action, which include substantial reductions in medical error. Finally, we address the free-rider problem posed by non-union physicians who might benefit from working improvements garnered through union action. We conclude that in order to maintain a notion of justice as fairness, resident physicians who benefit from union deliberations are impelled to acquire union membership or make a commensurate donation and that the healthcare organisations for which they work ought to share in the responsibility to improve patient care.

  • applied and professional ethics
  • interests of health personnel/institutions
  • education for health care professionals
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors ASB originally conceived of the concept for this essay and wrote the first draft. KM researched primary sources for the first draft and edited and compiled references. KM guided process of revisions. ASB responded to reviewer comments.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data sharing not applicable as no datasets were generated and/or analysed for this study.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.