Article info
PDFExtended essay
Neurointerventions and informed consent
- Correspondence to Sebastian Jon Holmen, Philosophy and Science Studies, Roskilde, Denmark; sjonh{at}ruc.dk
Citation
Neurointerventions and informed consent
Publication history
- Received April 27, 2020
- Revised August 4, 2020
- Accepted August 12, 2020
- First published September 10, 2020.
Online issue publication
January 07, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (7 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Frequently overlooked realistic moral bioenhancement interventions
- Should neurotechnological treatments offered to offenders always be in their best interests?
- Should violent offenders be forced to undergo neurotechnological treatment? A critical discussion of the ‘freedom of thought’ objection
- The kindest cut? Surgical castration, sex offenders and coercive offers
- Preventing sexual abusers of children from reoffending: systematic review of medical and psychological interventions
- Chemical castration for sex offenders
- Compulsory medical intervention versus external constraint in pandemic control
- Treatment for sexual offenders against children
- Public participation in genetic databases: crossing the boundaries between biobanks and forensic DNA databases through the principle of solidarity
- Right to mental integrity and neurotechnologies: implications of the extended mind thesis