Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The ethics of the unmentionable
  1. Arthur L Caplan
  1. Division of Medical Ethics, NYU, New York, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Arthur L Caplan, Division of Medical Ethics, NYU, New York, New York, USA; Arthur.Caplan{at}nyumc.org

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

For decades The People’s Republic of China has been expanding its capacity to perform organ transplants, primarily kidneys and livers but also hearts, lungs and multiorgan transplants. The annual number of organ transplants performed is estimated to be over 30 000. The number is expected to grow with a projected market for immunosuppressants expected to be over ¥30 billion/$4.3 billion by 2024.1

China is second only to the USA and is expected to become the country with the largest number of organ transplants by 2021 or 2022. Many transplants are performed on Chinese citizens but an active market in transplants for ‘tourists’ is ongoing.2

The source of the supply of organs to fuel this rapid growth has long been suspect.3 China had no system for obtaining organs for many years from cadaver sources making it impossible to credit claims that gifts from the newly dead were the sole or even majority source of transplantable organs. Critics, including myself, have long alleged that the only possible source of organs for both Chinese citizens and transplant tourists are executed prisoners. Many accounts, commissions and investigations have confirmed an immoral reliance on this vulnerable …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @arthurcaplan

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles