Article Text
Commentary
‘Harm threshold’: capacity for decision-making may be reduced by long-term pubertal suppression
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors Both authors contributed equally to the development of the commentary.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Forever young? The ethics of ongoing puberty suppression for non-binary adults
- Idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: a rare cause of primary amenorrhoea in adolescence—a review and update on diagnosis, management and advances in genetic understanding.
- Premature ovarian failure
- Long term follow-up of survivors of childhood cancer: summary of updated SIGN guidance
- TurnerFertility trial: PROTOCOL for an observational cohort study to describe the efficacy of ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation in females with Turner syndrome
- High court should not restrict access to puberty blockers for minors
- Gender dysphoria in children: puberty blockers study draws further criticism
- Premature ovarian insufficiency
- Surviving cancer or future motherhood? Both are possible: an Ewing sarcoma case in an 8-year-old girl
- Hormone supplementation for pubertal induction in girls