Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Valid consent to medical treatment
  1. Emma Cave
  1. Durham Law School, Durham University, Durham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Emma Cave, Durham Law School, Durham University, Durham, UK; emma.cave{at}durham.ac.uk

Abstract

When consent to medical treatment is described as ‘valid’, it might simply mean that it has a sound basis, or it could mean that it is legally valid. Where the two meanings are regularly interchanged, however, it can lead to aspects of the sound basis or the legal requirements being neglected. This article looks at how the term is used in a range of guidance on consent to treatment and argues for consistency.

  • informed consent
  • tort law
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Twitter @profEmmaCave

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement There are no data in this work.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.