Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Can bioethics be an honest way of making a living? A reflection on normativity, governance and expertise
  1. Silvia Camporesi1,
  2. Giulia Cavaliere2
  1. 1Global Health & Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
  2. 2Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Giulia Cavaliere, Lancaster Medical School, University of Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4YG, UK; g.cavaliere{at}lancaster.ac.uk

Abstract

The authority of bioethics as a field of inquiry and of bioethicists as scholars with a distinctive expertise is being questioned on various fronts. Sarah Franklin’s 2019 Nature commentary ‘Ethical research – the long and bumpy road from shirked to shared’ is the latest example . In this paper, we respond to these challenges by focusing on two key issues. First, we discuss the theory and practice of bioethics. We argue that both of these endeavours are fundamental components of this field of inquiry and that bioethics cannot be reduced to the contribution that it makes to the production of biopolicy, as Franklin suggests. Second, we contend that bioethicists have distinctive skills and knowledge that place them at an epistemic advantage in discussing normative questions. Hence, we reject views that deny the specific contribution that bioethicists can bring to assessing the ethics and governance of science and technology. We conclude by arguing that—despite formal and substantive differences between disciplines—philosophers, social scientists and other scholars should join forces and engage in critical friendships rather than turf wars to move towards the just governance of science and technology.

  • philosophical ethics
  • public policy
  • sociology
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Twitter @silviacamporesi, @giuli_cavaliere

  • Correction notice This article has been updated since it was first published online. Giulia Cavaliere's affiliation has been updated.

  • Contributors All authors contributed equally in the conceptualisation, writing and revising of this paper.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement There are no data in this work.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.