Article info
PDFOriginal research
Trust, trustworthiness and sharing patient data for research
- Correspondence to Dr Mark Sheehan, Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK; mark.sheehan{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Trust, trustworthiness and sharing patient data for research
Publication history
- Received January 5, 2020
- Accepted May 1, 2020
- First published May 18, 2020.
Online issue publication
January 07, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (7 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- The unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccine policy: why mandates, passports and restrictions may cause more harm than good
- The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble
- Trust and experiences of National Health Service healthcare do not fully explain demographic disparities in coronavirus vaccination uptake in the UK: a cross-sectional study
- How should we think about clinical data ownership?
- Trust and the Goldacre Review: why trusted research environments are not about trust
- Should free-text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizens’ jury study in the UK
- To trust or not to trust (in doctors)? That is the question
- Direct access to potential research participants for a cohort study using a confidentiality waiver included in UK National Health Service legal statutes
- Non-commercial clinical trials of a medicinal product: can they survive the current process of research approvals in the UK?
- Determining the need for ethical review: a three-stage Delphi study