Article Text
Abstract
The aim of this article is to provide a systematic reconstruction and critique of what is taken to be a central ethical concern against the use of non-medical egg freezing (NMEF). The concern can be captured in what we can call the individualisation argument. The argument states, very roughly, that women should not use NMEF as it is an individualistic and morally problematic solution to the social problems that women face, for instance, in the labour market. Instead of allowing or expecting women to deal with them on an individual level, we should address them by challenging the patriarchal structures of the labour market—for example, by securing equal pay, or paid maternal leave, or ‘paid paternal [partner] leave and sick leave and affordable child care’. It will be made clear that there are several versions of this argument. The author will try to elaborate this claim, and it will be explained that the differences depend on the way in which bioethicists believe that individuals use of NMEF is morally problematic, compared with the alternative of securing social change for women in, say, the labour market. Finally, a critical discussion of three versions of the individualisation argument will follow, and it will be shown why all versions are on rather thin ice, or in other words, that they are implausible.
- cryobanking of sperm, ova or embryos
- ethics
- reproductive medicine
- social aspects
- women
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Advancing technologies as both our saviour and our doom
- Individual solutions to social problems
- Discussing social hierarchies and the importance of genetic ties: a commentary on Petersen
- Beyond individualisation: towards a more contextualised understanding of women’s social egg freezing experiences
- Non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments: reply to Moen, Segers and Campo-Engelstein
- Disentangling the individualisation argument against non-medical egg freezing from feminist critiques
- Egg freezing for non-medical uses: the lack of a relational approach to autonomy in the new Israeli policy and in academic discussion
- Effectiveness of social egg freezing: protocol for systematic review and meta-analyses
- Deciding against disability: does the use of reproductive genetic technologies express disvalue for people with disabilities?
- Single women’s access to egg freezing in mainland China: an ethicolegal analysis