Article info
Original research
Withholding or withdrawing life support in long-term neurointensive care patients: a single-centre, prospective, observational pilot study
- Correspondence to Dr Annerose Maria Mengel, Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tubingen 72076, Germany; annerose.mengel{at}med.uni-tuebingen.de
Citation
Withholding or withdrawing life support in long-term neurointensive care patients: a single-centre, prospective, observational pilot study
Publication history
- Received December 18, 2019
- Revised February 24, 2020
- Accepted March 3, 2020
- First published May 5, 2020.
Online issue publication
December 22, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (5 May 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Withdrawing life support and resolution of conflict with families
- Safety and cost effectiveness of step-down unit admission following elective neurointerventional procedures
- Prompt closure versus gradual weaning of external ventricular drainage for hydrocephalus in adult patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review
- Euthanasia and other end of life decisions and care provided in final three months of life: nationwide retrospective study in Belgium
- Waiting for a miracle or best medical practice? End-of-life medical ethical dilemmas in Bahrain
- Role of patients’ family members in end-of-life communication: an integrative review
- On the difficulty of neurosurgical end of life decisions
- Advance care planning in COPD: guidance development for healthcare professionals
- Morisprudence: a theoretical framework for studying the relationship linking moral case deliberation, organisational learning and quality improvement
- Finnish doctors and the realisation of patient autonomy in the context of end of life decision making