Article info
Original research
Value of choice
- Correspondence to Dr Tom Walker, School of History, Anthropology, Philosophy, and Politics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1PB, UK; tom.walker{at}qub.ac.uk
Citation
Value of choice
Publication history
- Received January 6, 2020
- Revised April 7, 2020
- Accepted April 16, 2020
- First published April 30, 2020.
Online issue publication
December 22, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (30 April 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- The concise argument – choice, choices and the choice agenda
- Choice is not the issue. The misrepresentation of healthcare in bioethical discourse
- Public deliberation and private choice in genetics and reproduction
- Should healthcare professionals respect autonomy just because it promotes welfare?
- Values for victims and vectors of disease
- The concise argument: the importance of consent and choice
- Is respect for autonomy defensible?
- Rationality, religion and refusal of treatment in an ambulance revisited
- Organisational values of National Health Service trusts in England: semantic analysis and relation to performance indicators
- Collaborative design of a decision aid for stroke survivors with multimorbidity: a qualitative study in the UK engaging key stakeholders