Article Text
PDFCommentary
Commentary on ‘The right not to know and the obligation not to know’
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors BB conducted this research and is the sole author of the article.
Funding This research was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and the Intramural Research Program of the National Human Genome Research Institute.
Disclaimer The views herein are the author’s own and do not represent the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services or the National Institutes of Health.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Right to refuse treatment in Turkey: a diagnosis and a slightly less than modest proposal for reform
- Examining the ethico-legal aspects of the right to refuse treatment in Turkey
- The views of cancer patients on patient rights in the context of information and autonomy
- Autonomy in medical ethics after O’Neill
- Ethical issues in predictive genetic testing: a public health perspective
- The case of Ms B: suicide’s slippery slope?
- Three arguments against prescription requirements
- Jehovah’s Witnesses in the emergency department: what are their rights?
- A disability perspective from the United States on the case of Ms B
- Bioethics in a clinic for women with psychosis