Article info
Original research
Ethics of resuscitation for extremely premature infants: a systematic review of argument-based literature
- Correspondence to Alice Cavolo, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium; alice.cavolo{at}kuleuven.be
Citation
Ethics of resuscitation for extremely premature infants: a systematic review of argument-based literature
Publication history
- Received January 29, 2020
- Revised March 18, 2020
- Accepted April 10, 2020
- First published April 27, 2020.
Online issue publication
November 29, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Default options and neonatal resuscitation decisions
- The attitudes of neonatologists towards extremely preterm infants: a Q methodological study
- Resuscitation of preterm infants in the Philippines: a national survey of resources and practice
- Resuscitation of the preterm infant against parental wishes
- In what circumstances will a neonatologist decide a patient is not a resuscitation candidate?
- Decision-making at the border of viability: determining the best interests of extremely preterm infants
- Viability and thresholds for treatment of extremely preterm infants: survey of UK neonatal professionals
- Opinions of paediatricians who teach neonatal resuscitation about resuscitation practices on extremely preterm infants in the delivery room
- AI support for ethical decision-making around resuscitation: proceed with care
- European variation in decision-making and parental involvement during preterm birth