Article info
PDFOriginal research
In the name of science: animal appellations and best practice
- Correspondence to Jessica du Toit, Philosophy, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; jess.dutoit{at}gmail.com
Citation
In the name of science: animal appellations and best practice
Publication history
- Received February 5, 2020
- Revised March 13, 2020
- Accepted March 30, 2020
- First published April 24, 2020.
Online issue publication
November 27, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 November 2020).
- Previous version (27 November 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Animal research nexus: a new approach to the connections between science, health and animal welfare
- Reforming the politics of animal research
- Animal rights, animal minds, and human mindreading
- Biodefence and the production of knowledge: rethinking the problem
- Diversity and inclusion for rodents: how animal ethics committees can help improve translation
- Is animal research sufficiently evidence based to be a cornerstone of biomedical research?
- Do non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs adversely affect stress fracture healing? A short review
- Is there a place for animal experiments?
- Clinical impact of high-profile animal-based research reported in the UK national press
- Whistleblowing in academic medicine