Article metrics
PDF
Other content recommended for you
- Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access
- Ethics of routine: a critical analysis of the concept of ‘routinisation’ in prenatal screening
- Introducing the non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of Down syndrome in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis
- Introducing the non-invasive prenatal test for trisomy 21 in Belgium: a cost-consequences analysis
- Expansion of non-invasive prenatal screening to the screening of 10 types of chromosomal anomalies: a cost-effectiveness analysis
- ‘Is it better not to know certain things?’: views of women who have undergone non-invasive prenatal testing on its possible future applications
- Preserving women’s reproductive autonomy while promoting the rights of people with disabilities?: the case of Heidi Crowter and Maire Lea-Wilson in the light of NIPT debates in England, France and Germany
- Women’s choices in non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy screening: results from a single centre prior to introduction in England
- Cell-free fetal DNA and RNA in maternal blood: implications for safer antenatal testing
- Uptake, outcomes, and costs of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing for Down’s syndrome into NHS maternity care: prospective cohort study in eight diverse maternity units