Article info
PDFResponse
Parental responsibilities and moral status
- Correspondence to Mr Bruce Philip Blackshaw, Philosophy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; bblackshaw{at}gmail.com
Citation
Parental responsibilities and moral status
Publication history
- Received February 29, 2020
- Accepted March 12, 2020
- First published April 6, 2020.
Online issue publication
January 09, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (9 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Defending the distinction between pregnancy and parenthood
- Orphans and the relational significance of birth: a response to Singh
- Orphans cannot be after-birth aborted: a response to Bobier
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Subjects of ectogenesis: are ‘gestatelings’ fetuses, newborns or neither?
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Parental enhancement and symmetry of power in the parent–child relationship
- Clinicians’ criteria for fetal moral status: viability and relationality, not sentience