Article info
PDFCurrent controversy
Advance euthanasia directives and the Dutch prosecution
- Correspondence to Dr Jonathan A Hughes, School of Law, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK; j.a.hughes{at}keele.ac.uk
Citation
Advance euthanasia directives and the Dutch prosecution
Publication history
- Received February 5, 2020
- Revised March 6, 2020
- Accepted March 20, 2020
- First published April 6, 2020.
Online issue publication
April 13, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (13 April 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- First prosecution of a Dutch doctor since the Euthanasia Act of 2002: what does the verdict mean?
- Advance euthanasia directives: a controversial case and its ethical implications
- AEDs are problematic, but Mrs A is a misleading case
- Euthanasia in persons with advanced dementia: a dignity-enhancing care approach
- Ethics of care challenge to advance directives for dementia patients
- Dementia and advance directives: some empirical and normative concerns
- Response to: ‘Dementia and advance directives: some empirical and normative concerns’ by Jongsma et al
- The role of advance euthanasia directives as an aid to communication and shared decision-making in dementia
- Is this person with dementia (currently) competent to request euthanasia? A complicated and underexplored question
- Tom Buller on the principle of precedent autonomy and the relation between critical and experiential interests