Article info
Original research
Priority setting and personal health responsibility: an analysis of Norwegian key policy documents
- Correspondence to Gloria Traina, Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo 0317, Norway; gloria.traina{at}medisin.uio.no
Citation
Priority setting and personal health responsibility: an analysis of Norwegian key policy documents
Publication history
- Received June 5, 2019
- Revised February 11, 2020
- Accepted February 17, 2020
- First published March 2, 2020.
Online issue publication
January 10, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (8 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Supplementary Data
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- On the relevance of personal responsibility in priority setting: a cross-sectional survey among Norwegian medical doctors
- Just health responsibility
- Personal responsibility for health as a rationing criterion: why we don’t like it and why maybe we should
- Prevention in the age of personal responsibility: epigenetic risk-predictive screening for female cancers as a case study
- ‘There is a lot of good in knowing, but there is also a lot of downs’: public views on ethical considerations in population genomic screening
- Against tiebreaking arguments in priority setting
- Personal responsibility within health policy: unethical and ineffective
- Personal responsibility for health: conceptual clarity, and fairness in policy and practice
- Responsibility in healthcare across time and agents
- Meikirch model: new definition of health as hypothesis to fundamentally improve healthcare delivery