Article info
PDFFeature article
Gestation, equality and freedom: ectogenesis as a political perspective
- Correspondence to Dr Giulia Cavaliere, Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YG, UK; g.cavaliere{at}lancaster.ac.uk
Citation
Gestation, equality and freedom: ectogenesis as a political perspective
Publication history
- Received July 8, 2019
- Revised October 24, 2019
- Accepted October 30, 2019
- First published November 8, 2019.
Online issue publication
February 07, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (7 February 2020).
- Previous version (7 February 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Willing mothers: ectogenesis and the role of gestational motherhood
- Commentary on ‘Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective’
- Impact of ectogenesis on the medicalisation of pregnancy and childbirth
- Partial ectogenesis: freedom, equality and political perspective
- ‘Gestation, Equality and Freedom: Ectogenesis as a Political Perspective’ response to commentaries
- Imagine a world… where ectogenesis isn’t needed to eliminate social and economic barriers for women
- More than an idea: why ectogestation should become a concrete option
- Reproductive technologies are not the cure for social problems
- Medical ethics and broadening the context of debate
- Gender, gestation and ectogenesis: self-determination for pregnant people ahead of artificial wombs