Article info
PDFResponse
Why public funding for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) might still be wrong: a response to Bunnik and colleagues
- Correspondence to Dr Dagmar Schmitz, Department of History, Theory and Ethics in Medicine, Medical School, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany; daschmitz{at}ukaachen.de
Citation
Why public funding for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) might still be wrong: a response to Bunnik and colleagues
Publication history
- Received October 8, 2019
- Accepted October 24, 2019
- First published November 12, 2019.
Online issue publication
November 12, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (12 November 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Introducing the non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of Down syndrome in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis
- Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access
- Ethics of routine: a critical analysis of the concept of ‘routinisation’ in prenatal screening
- Introducing the non-invasive prenatal test for trisomy 21 in Belgium: a cost-consequences analysis
- Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis: progress and potential
- Why NIPT should be publicly funded
- Uptake, outcomes, and costs of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing for Down’s syndrome into NHS maternity care: prospective cohort study in eight diverse maternity units
- Ethical considerations for choosing between possible models for using NIPD for aneuploidy detection
- Hostile environments? Down’s syndrome and genetic screening in contemporary culture
- ‘Is it better not to know certain things?’: views of women who have undergone non-invasive prenatal testing on its possible future applications