Article Text
Abstract
The two tragedies argument (2TA) has been raised as a response to the argument against abortion from spontaneous abortion (or miscarriages). According to this argument against the antiabortion position (AAP), miscarriages should be of great concern for proponents of this position since they result in a greater amount of deaths of human beings than induced abortions do. According to critics of AAP, this fact undermines its plausibility, since proponents of the AAP either must try to prevent miscarriages to the same extent as they try to prevent abortions or abandon their opposition to at least some abortions—which are not acceptable options for proponents of APP. The claim of 2TA is that one can differentiate between induced abortion and miscarriages due to the fact that the former involves the act of killing of another human being. This fact adds a tragedy to the tragedy that both abortions and miscarriages result in – the death of a human being – and contributes to justifying the choice of proponents of AAP to prioritise the prevention of abortions rather than miscarriages. In this response, I defend 2TA against criticism that claims that this argument is: (1) inconsistent with the AAP and (2) trivialises the death of the fetus. My claim is that the first line of criticism rests on a misunderstanding of the premises of 2TA while the second line of criticism rests on a disanalogous thought experiment. I therefore conclude that these objections fail.
- abortion
- miscarriages, two tragedies argument
- william simkulet
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The Two tragedies argument
- Two Tragedies Argument: Two Mistakes
- Within the limits of the defensible: a response to Simkulet’s argument against the pro-life view on the basis of spontaneous abortion
- Cursed lamp: the problem of spontaneous abortion
- Prolife hypocrisy: why inconsistency arguments do not matter
- Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise
- The inconsistency argument: why apparent pro-life inconsistency undermines opposition to induced abortion
- Inconsistency arguments still do not matter
- Critical notice—Defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith
- Of souls, selves, and cerebrums: a reply to Himma