Article info
PDFCommentary
Common morality and medical ethics: not so different after all
- Correspondence to Professor Ruth Macklin, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA; ruth.macklin{at}einstein.yu.edu
Citation
Common morality and medical ethics: not so different after all
Publication history
- Received September 19, 2019
- Accepted September 26, 2019
- First published October 11, 2019.
Online issue publication
December 06, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (6 December 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Why not common morality?
- Uncommon misconceptions and common morality
- A Defence of medical ethics as uncommon morality
- Taking a moral holiday? Physicians’ practical identities at the margins of professional ethics
- A waste of time: the problem of common morality in Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- On Rhodes’s failure to appreciate the connections between common morality theory and professional biomedical ethics
- Bioethics and multiculturalism: nuancing the discussion
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- Why only common morality?
- The problem of ‘thick in status, thin in content’ in Beauchamp and Childress' principlism