Article Text
Response
Understanding choice, pressure and markets in kidneys
Abstract
Here, I briefly respond to a recent paper by Julian Koplin, in which he criticises my earlier work in this journal. I show that Koplin has misunderstood the distinction I have made between pressure to vend and pressure with the option to vend. I also show that his pessimism about the market regulations I favour is unwarranted.
- donation/procurement of organs/tissues
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors LS is responsible for the entirety of the work.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Choice, pressure and markets in kidneys
- The best argument against kidney sales fails
- Would you sell a kidney in a regulated kidney market? Results of an exploratory study
- A legal market in organs: the problem of exploitation
- The ethics of biomedical markets
- Imposing options on people in poverty: the harm of a live donor organ market
- The search for organs: halachic perspectives on altruistic giving and the selling of organs
- Investigating kidney donation as a risk factor for hypertension and microalbuminuria: findings from the Swiss prospective follow-up of living kidney donors
- Prospective Swiss cohort study of living-kidney donors: study protocol
- Hypertension, cardiovascular disease and cause of death in Danish living kidney donors: matched cohort study