Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The end of religious exemptions from immunisation requirements?
  1. Gregory L Bock
  1. Department of Literature and Languages, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, Texas, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Gregory L Bock, Department of Literature and Languages, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX 75799, USA; gbock{at}uttyler.edu

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to propose a middle ground in the debate over religious exemptions from measles vaccination requirements. It attempts to strike a balance between public health concerns on the one hand and religious objections on the other that avoids two equally serious errors: (1) making religious liberty an absolute and (2) disregarding religious beliefs altogether. Some think that the issue is straightforward: science has spoken and the benefits to public health outweigh any other concerns. The safety of the community, they say, demands that everybody be vaccinated so that measles outbreaks can be prevented, but such voices often ignore the freedom of religion, which is a mistake. Using Martha Nussbaum’s work on religious liberty, this paper claims that the exemptions should be preserved if a certain level of vaccination rates can be maintained.

  • immunisation
  • measles
  • religious beliefs
  • children
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors GLB was the sole author of this article.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.