Article Text
Commentary
Public reason’s private roles: legitimising disengagement from religious patients and managing physician trauma
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Responding to religious patients: why physicians have no business doing theology
- Responding (appropriately) to religious patients: a response to Greenblum and Hubbard’s ‘Public Reason’ argument
- Public reason and the limited right to conscientious objection: a response to Magelssen
- Physicians’ duty to refrain from religious discourse: a response to critics
- Doing theology in medical decision-making
- Whither religion in medicine?
- The importance of prudence within inclusive bioethics
- Rawlsian justice in healthcare: a response to Cox and Fritz
- Legitimacy in bioethics: challenging the orthodoxy
- Does the General Medical Council’s 2020 guidance on consent advance on its 2008 guidance?