Article Text
PDFCommentary
Response to commentaries on Powell/Scarffe feature article
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Correction notice This article has been amended since it was first published online. The authors' affiliation was published with a typo. This has now been corrected.
Contributors -
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- ‘Rethinking “Disease”: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’
- Does the harm component of the harmful dysfunction analysis need rethinking?: Reply to Powell and Scarffe
- The transformation of (bio)ethics expertise in a world of ethical pluralism
- Abortion and regret
- Resourcefulness of an empirically informed and thickly normative account of disease
- Whose values? Whose reasons? A commentary on ‘Rethinking disease: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’ by Powell and Scarffe
- Designing AI for mental health diagnosis: challenges from sub-Saharan African value-laden judgements on mental health disorders
- Ecological study of the association between mental illness with human development, income inequalities and unemployment across OECD countries
- An argument for intolerance
- Lord Sumption and the values of life, liberty and security: before and since the COVID-19 outbreak