Article Text
Abstract
In their paper Horton et al argue that it is acceptable to contact an anonymous egg-donor to facilitate diagnostic genetic testing for the donor conceived child, despite the donor, ‘indicating on a historical consent form that she did not wish to take part in future research, and that she did not wish to be informed if she was found to be a carrier of a “harmful inherited condition”’. There are a number of claims embedded in Horton et al’s position that it is acceptable to contact the donor and request that she at least think about participating in genetic testing. In this response. I will go through their main claims and argue that the area of genomic medicine does not justify exceptions to general consent conditions as the authors suppose and conclude that the donor should not be contacted. I will then go on to suggest a policy change that would address Horton et al’s concerns but would not involve over-riding any previously expressed wishes.
- genetic information
- genetic screening/testing
- informed consent
- reproductive medicine
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Is it acceptable to contact an anonymous egg donor to facilitate diagnostic genetic testing for the donor-conceived child?
- Old consent and new developments: health professionals should ask and not presume
- Mitochondrial donation and ‘the right to know’
- Ethical problems with ethnic matching in gamete donation
- Intractable infertility
- Differences between sperm sharing and egg sharing are morally relevant
- Ethics briefings
- Payment to egg donors is to be tripled to remedy shortage
- Lowering the age limit of access to the identity of the gamete donor by donor offspring: the argument against
- The ethical case for non-directed postmortem sperm donation