Article info
PDFExtended essay
Ulysses Contracts in psychiatric care: helping patients to protect themselves from spiralling
- Correspondence to Dr Rob Lawlor, Inter-Disciplinary Ethics Applied, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK; r.s.lawlor{at}leeds.ac.uk
Citation
Ulysses Contracts in psychiatric care: helping patients to protect themselves from spiralling
Publication history
- Received April 18, 2019
- Revised July 28, 2019
- Accepted August 5, 2019
- First published September 4, 2019.
Online issue publication
October 25, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (25 October 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Advance directives in psychiatric care: a narrative approach
- Cake or death? Ending confusions about asymmetries between consent and refusal
- The Ulysses contract in obstetrics: a woman's choices before and during labour
- Paediatric xenotransplantation clinical trials and the right to withdraw
- Socially and temporally extended end-of-life decision-making process for dementia patients
- Obesity, paternalism and fairness
- Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide?
- The validity of contracts to dispose of frozen embryos
- Waiving legal rights in research
- Risk-related standards of competence are a nonsense