Article Text
Abstract
Advocates of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) often argue that, although the provision of PAS is morally permissible for persons with terminal, somatic illnesses, it is impermissible for patients suffering from psychiatric conditions. This claim is justified on the basis that psychiatric illnesses have certain morally relevant characteristics and/or implications that distinguish them from their somatic counterparts. In this paper, I address three arguments of this sort. First, that psychiatric conditions compromise a person’s decision-making capacity. Second, that we cannot have sufficient certainty that a person’s psychiatric condition is untreatable. Third, that the institutionalisation of PAS for mental illnesses presents morally unacceptable risks. I argue that, if we accept that PAS is permissible for patients with somatic conditions, then none of these three arguments are strong enough to demonstrate that the exclusion of psychiatric patients from access to PAS is justifiable.
- psychiatry
- competence/incompetence
- suicide/assisted suicide
- ethics
- clinical ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Embracing slippery slope on physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia could have significant unintended consequences
- Medical assistance in dying for the psychiatrically ill reply to Buturovic
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven
- Competence for physician-assisted death of patients with mental disorders: theoretical and practical considerations
- Ethical examination of deep brain stimulation’s ‘last resort’ status
- Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups
- Informed consent for clinical trials of deep brain stimulation in psychiatric disease: challenges and implications for trial design
- Legal physician-assisted suicide in Oregon and The Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in vulnerable groups—another perspective on Oregon's data
- Can physicians conceive of performing euthanasia in case of psychiatric disease, dementia or being tired of living?
- Restraint in somatic healthcare: how should it be regulated?